Gratiano loses his Priscus title (LSJ)

Ok. It created a lot confusion on our national forum. SO Gratiano becomes Regent and loses his Priscus title. Can he casts his vote in prisci subreferendum if: a) there are other Prisci on the table b) there are no other Prisci in play. I would say that it is yes in both cases, but we need some confirmation Sathriel

[ quoted text not captured ] Yes, he always gets his "extra" vote in the Prisci sub-referendum. Even if Fall of the Sabbat has been played. --Colin McGuigan

In message <gsadnXSQ3te...@speakeasy.net>, Colin McGuigan <magu...@BGONEspeakeasy.net> writes: >Yes, he always gets his "extra" vote in the Prisci sub-referendum. Corner-case quibble: not always - Seeds of Corruption will stop it, for instance. >Even if Fall of the Sabbat has been played. Yeah, that one's pretty evil. :-) I remember the screams when people realised this was possible with Regent, and how broken it was going to be. Never really set the world alight. Nice to see that some people are still working on it, though. Is it wrong to want to add Legendary Vampire into the mix, too? -- James Coupe PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D YOU ARE IN ERROR. EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 NO-ONE IS SCREAMING. 13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.

Colin McGuigan wrote: > sath...@o2.pl wrote: >> Gratiano becomes Regent and loses his Priscus title. Can he casts his >> vote in prisci subreferendum if: >> >> a) there are other Prisci on the table >> >> b) there are no other Prisci in play. >> >> I would say that it is yes in both cases, but we need some confirmation > > Yes, he always gets his "extra" vote in the Prisci sub-referendum. Even > if Fall of the Sabbat has been played. Correct. -- LSJ (vtesr...@TRAPwhite-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep (remove spam trap to reply) Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

[ quoted text not captured ] What's the deal with regent and fall of the sabbat? you get one but and noone can rush you, right?

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Omael wrote: > What's the deal with regent and fall of the sabbat? you get one but and > noone can rush you, right? It's not playable if the Sabbat has already fallen since it says "Put this card on a Sabbat vampire you control with a capacity above 7." Otherwise, yeah. If the Sabbat were to fall with Regent already in play, the Regent would still get a single vote and the rush action would not be usable. Nor could the card be transferred via diablerie. Matt Morgan

Matthew T. Morgan wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Omael wrote: > > What's the deal with regent and fall of the sabbat? you get one but and > > noone can rush you, right? > > It's not playable if the Sabbat has already fallen since it says "Put this > card on a Sabbat vampire you control with a capacity above 7." Well, you could still play it on Mata Hari. That would give her a (non-title) vote and the inactive title of Cardinal, which would make her independent 2-vote title go away. When the player controlling Fall of the Sabbat was ousted, her Cardinal title would be active and newly reactivated Sabbat could rush her.

[ quoted text not captured ] This would only work if she'd gone Into the Fire. I don't think Mata Hari's ability lets her hold a Sabbat title without actually being Sabbat. If she hadn't gone Into the Fire, she'd be swapping her "2 votes" title for that of Cardinal, which instantly becomes inactive regardless of whether or not the Sabbat has fallen because she's the wrong sect. She would gain the extra vote and could get rushed by Sabbat if there were any. Sounds like a great deck! Matt Morgan

In message <1120596954.2...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Emmit Svenson <emmits...@hotmail.com> writes: >Matthew T. Morgan wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Omael wrote: >> > What's the deal with regent and fall of the sabbat? you get one but and >> > noone can rush you, right? >> >> It's not playable if the Sabbat has already fallen since it says "Put this >> card on a Sabbat vampire you control with a capacity above 7." > >Well, you could still play it on Mata Hari. I'm not sure you could, since the card doesn't actually *require* a member of the Sabbat, it just goes on one. [ quoted text not captured ]

James Coupe wrote: > In message <1120596954.2...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > Emmit Svenson <emmits...@hotmail.com> writes: > >>Matthew T. Morgan wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Omael wrote: >>> >>>>What's the deal with regent and fall of the sabbat? you get one but and >>>>noone can rush you, right? >>> >>>It's not playable if the Sabbat has already fallen since it says "Put this >>>card on a Sabbat vampire you control with a capacity above 7." >> >>Well, you could still play it on Mata Hari. > > I'm not sure you could, since the card doesn't actually *require* a > member of the Sabbat, it just goes on one. Right. You just have to control one -- it needn't be ready, so the card doesn't require one. [ quoted text not captured ]

And, on a simmilar note, can Regent Gratiano cast the sub-referendal vote in one favour, and his regular four votes in the other?

On 20 Jul 2005 03:42:07 -0700, <anc...@vampirethemasquerade.com> wrote: > And, on a simmilar note, can Regent Gratiano cast the sub-referendal > vote in one favour, and his regular four votes in the other? No way. A vampire can only cast his or her votes in one way (and must cast all available votes in the same way). -- Bye, Daneel