(LSJ) Flesh o' Marbelle / Disarm

Can a vampire hitting for 'more' damage which is then reduced to one by the opposing vamp's lovely FoM still Disarm at the end of the round ? Think I know the answer but have to ask as it has been an ongoing question for about a year. Rob T. PS.Ridiculous but great cards No.1 Leather Jacket Lazverinus is really pissed with Basil and fires up to hit for 12 agg enough damage to tear a hole in the fabric of space - and is foiled by Basil's kinky leather J ?? hmmmmm

On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, shsoton wrote: > Can a vampire hitting for 'more' damage which is then reduced to one by the > opposing vamp's lovely FoM still Disarm at the end of the round ? No. Flesh of Marble prevents (not reduces) damage - so it doesn't count towards disarm because it wasn't successfully inflicted. -- James Coupe | PGP Key 0x5D623D5D "But I don't have the right to be with you tonight, so please leave me alone with no saviour in sight. I will sleep safe and sound with nobody around me."

shsoton wrote: > Can a vampire hitting for 'more' damage which is then reduced to one by the > opposing vamp's lovely FoM still Disarm at the end of the round ? > Think I know the answer but have to ask as it has been an ongoing question > for about a year. No. Disarm requires the vamp to have "successfully inflicted more damage". (card text). -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.geocities.com/vtesrep

In article <Pine.SOL.4.21.000425...@orange.csi.cam.ac.uk>, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote: > -- > James Coupe | PGP Key 0x5D623D5D > "But I don't have the right to be with you tonight, so please leave me > alone with no saviour in sight. I will sleep safe and sound with nobody > around me." Now, it seems a shame to stop this sig line here, just as it was getting interesting. Personally I feel that if you were to be 'faced with your demons', as the warbley Ms. Matthews suggests, then the likelyhood of you 'clothing and feeding' them would be rather slim. Indeed, were the next line of suggest that the unfortunate soul 'logically refute their existance and berate them' then the sig would be somehow more appropriate. In fact, were this state of affairs to occur upon your untimely demise (going to zero pool for the last time) then the line '..and challenge them to a game of V:TES' would be somehow more suitable. In any case the outcome of any such game would be moot as Rob T. would inevitably win (because, as we all know, that he traded his soul to the devil long ago for the ability to win any game of vampire, a Dreams of the Sphinx and 7 Legacy of Pander's). still, interesting reading though. --- Matt. Green. You can burn me out, but i'll be back at your door. Like Joan of Arc coming back for more. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

mgre...@my-deja.com wrote: >> James Coupe | PGP Key 0x5D623D5D >> "But I don't have the right to be with you tonight, so please leave >> me alone with no saviour in sight. I will sleep safe and sound with >> nobody around me." > > Now, it seems a shame to stop this sig line here, just as it was > getting interesting. Personally I feel that if you were to be 'faced > with your demons', as the warbley Ms. Matthews suggests, then the > likelyhood of you 'clothing and feeding' them would be rather slim. > Indeed, were the next line of suggest that the unfortunate soul > 'logically refute their existance and berate them' then the sig would > be somehow more appropriate. ...or maybe James is just lamenting a lack of night time companionship or some other relationship disfunction. *shrug* Hell, my sig is pretty damned ironic when you consider how pushy a person I usually am. *wry grin* Noal -- "What you cannot enforce, do not command." -- Socrates [ quoted text not captured ]

On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Noal McDonald wrote: > ...or maybe James is just lamenting a lack of night time companionship > or some other relationship disfunction. *shrug* Not currently being in a relationship might negate the possibility of the latter..... Alternatively, I might just be quoting a song I like. -- [ quoted text not captured ]

>> ...or maybe James is just lamenting a lack of night time >> companionship or some other relationship disfunction. *shrug* > > Not currently being in a relationship might negate the > possibility of the latter..... Hence the former suggestion. Not that idle speculation by a yank carries any weight. *wry grin* > Alternatively, I might just be quoting a song I like. Naah. That couldn't be it. ;) Seriously, it's not unheard of for people to put lyrics or quotes in their .sig that pertains to what's going on in their life. I do it all the time in my profile on ISCA BBS (bulletin board system for you internet newbies), but not so much on my newsgroup and e-mail accounts. I didn't know if that was the case for you; hence the speculation on the reason for your quoting those specific lines as opposed to others. [ quoted text not captured ]

On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Noal McDonald wrote: > I didn't know if that was the case for you; hence the speculation on the > reason for your quoting those specific lines as opposed to others. Heh... and I was expecting this sig to be uncontroversial. :) I used to get some people following me round for sig changes.... [ quoted text not captured ]