[LSJ] Anathema Question

The ruling for Anathema is that there has to be a "reduction" is blood to burn the Vampire. Question: A Vamp with the card on and no blood on it, takes one damage in combat is burned. Correct? (Just thinking of the "reduction" from 0 to 0, but topor) -Markus

Markus Schlein <y000...@tu-bs.de> wrote: > Question: A Vamp with the card on and no blood on it, takes one > damage in combat is burned. Correct? (Just thinking of the > "reduction" from 0 to 0, but topor) Nope. There has to be a reduction from more than zero blood to zero blood, regardless of whether the vampire is going to torpor or not. Noal McDonald -- "What you cannot enforce, do not command." -- Socrates Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

Markus Schlein wrote: > > The ruling for Anathema is that there has to be a "reduction" is blood to > burn the Vampire. > > Question: A Vamp with the card on and no blood on it, takes one damage in > combat is burned. Correct? (Just thinking of the "reduction" from 0 to 0, > but topor) No. Going from zero to zero is not a reduction (nor an increase) in blood - it is "no change". Becoming unready (going to torpor) is not a factor, since it is not mentioned on the card. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

On Tue, 23 May 2000 15:00:49 GMT, Noal McDonald <dhar...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Markus Schlein <y000...@tu-bs.de> wrote: >> Question: A Vamp with the card on and no blood on it, takes one >> damage in combat is burned. Correct? (Just thinking of the >> "reduction" from 0 to 0, but topor) > >Nope. There has to be a reduction from more than zero blood to zero >blood, regardless of whether the vampire is going to torpor or not. Mercy for the Weak, Psyche!, and Catatonic Fear! YEAH! (sorry) -- Derek Deafness never kept composers from hearing the music. It only stopped them hearing the distractions.