/*
** Rulings which required followups are marked as *CONFIRMED*, *REVERSED*,
** or what have you.
**
** Accurate as of 9/3/94.
*/
If the vampire using The Rack is burned, then the rack is effectively
stranded until someone takes control of it, at which point they can
assign it to a new vampire.
Owl Companion has truly odd wording. Basically the way it works is this:
Let's say Basilla has an owl companion, and enters into combat with
Cassandra. For the duration of the combat, *all* players may look at
Cassandra's hands.
If Storm Sewers was used to modify an action which is blocked, then
the "choose range" step is skipped for the duration of that combat, and
all cards which would be used before range was chosen are used before
strikes are chosen instead.
*CONFIRMED* Sudden Reversal can be used to either cancel a master card
as it's being played, or to burn a master card which is already in play.
The only time uncontrolled vampires are checked for sufficient blood capacity
is at the end of the influence phase. So if Govern the Unaligned or a similar
card is used to fill up an uncontrolled vampire, it will still have to
wait to come into the active region.
The Second Tradition (Domain) has truly awful wording. It does what you
probably think it does, which is to say, it untaps the vampire (allowing it
to block) and gives the vampire +2 intercept.
The rule is that a given vampire can only use a reaction card once per
action. So if you could use two Dread Gazes during a vote, but only if
you had two untapped, ready vampires with Presence.
There is no limit to how many vampires can be in your uncontrolled region.
Cryptic Mission can be used against a vampire with no blood on it; it just
won't do anything to that vampire. If the acting vampire has superior
Thaumaturgy, then it gets a blood from the bank, whether the victim has
any blood left or not.
Your vampires don't have to vote, and in fact they can cast different
votes (i.e. some voting "yes" and some voting "no").
*ERRATA* Having multiple Armies of Rats out is redundant, not cumulative.
Your prey will only be losing 1 pool during your untap phase regardless of
how many Armies you have out (as long as you have at least one out, of course).
It will be rewritten in a later printing.
Vast Wealth is not a one-shot action. It appears that the intention was
that it be one-shot, but there is nothing on the card indicating that it is,
so it's reusable. Just be warned that there might be errata, though I don't
think it's abusable enough to be worth it...
You can only attack the subject of Haven Uncovered while it is ready.
It does not create an exception to the rule that you cannot take actions
against vampires in torpor.
Tom Wylie rec.games.deckmaster Network Representative for
aahz@hal.com Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
/*
** Rulings which required followups are marked as *CONFIRMED*, *REVERSED*,
** or what have you.
**
** Accurate as of 9/3/94.
*/
If the vampire using The Rack is burned, then the rack is effectively
stranded until someone takes control of it, at which point they can
assign it to a new vampire.
Owl Companion has truly odd wording. Basically the way it works is this:
Let's say Basilla has an owl companion, and enters into combat with
Cassandra. For the duration of the combat, *all* players may look at
Cassandra's hands.
If Storm Sewers was used to modify an action which is blocked, then
the "choose range" step is skipped for the duration of that combat, and
all cards which would be used before range was chosen are used before
strikes are chosen instead.
*CONFIRMED* Sudden Reversal can be used to either cancel a master card
as it's being played, or to burn a master card which is already in play.
The only time uncontrolled vampires are checked for sufficient blood capacity
is at the end of the influence phase. So if Govern the Unaligned or a similar
card is used to fill up an uncontrolled vampire, it will still have to
wait to come into the active region.
The Second Tradition (Domain) has truly awful wording. It does what you
probably think it does, which is to say, it untaps the vampire (allowing it
to block) and gives the vampire +2 intercept.
The rule is that a given vampire can only use a reaction card once per
action. So if you could use two Dread Gazes during a vote, but only if
you had two untapped, ready vampires with Presence.
There is no limit to how many vampires can be in your uncontrolled region.
Cryptic Mission can be used against a vampire with no blood on it; it just
won't do anything to that vampire. If the acting vampire has superior
Thaumaturgy, then it gets a blood from the bank, whether the victim has
any blood left or not.
Your vampires don't have to vote, and in fact they can cast different
votes (i.e. some voting "yes" and some voting "no").
*ERRATA* Having multiple Armies of Rats out is redundant, not cumulative.
Your prey will only be losing 1 pool during your untap phase regardless of
how many Armies you have out (as long as you have at least one out, of course).
It will be rewritten in a later printing.
Vast Wealth is not a one-shot action. It appears that the intention was
that it be one-shot, but there is nothing on the card indicating that it is,
so it's reusable. Just be warned that there might be errata, though I don't
think it's abusable enough to be worth it...
You can only attack the subject of Haven Uncovered while it is ready.
It does not create an exception to the rule that you cannot take actions
against vampires in torpor.
Tom Wylie rec.games.deckmaster Network Representative for
aahz@hal.com Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
aahz@hal.COM (Tom Wylie) writes:
>Your vampires don't have to vote, and in fact they can cast different
>votes (i.e. some voting "yes" and some voting "no").
Can A justicar cast "One for, two against?" Can a justicar cast "one for,
two abstain?"
--
| kreme@netcom.com \ 1015 South Gaylord, Denver, CO 80209 #100 |
| PGP Fingerprint \ 1D 5E F7 C8 7E C2 F9 87 0F 86 C9 B0 D2 63 9C B2 |
| [303/722-2009] Vox \ |
| [303/777-2911] Data \ REMEMBER: No one knows you are a dog. |
aahz@hal.COM (Tom Wylie) writes:
>Your vampires don't have to vote, and in fact they can cast different
>votes (i.e. some voting "yes" and some voting "no").
Can A justicar cast "One for, two against?" Can a justicar cast "one for,
two abstain?"
--
| kreme@netcom.com \ 1015 South Gaylord, Denver, CO 80209 #100 |
| PGP Fingerprint \ 1D 5E F7 C8 7E C2 F9 87 0F 86 C9 B0 D2 63 9C B2 |
| [303/722-2009] Vox \ |
| [303/777-2911] Data \ REMEMBER: No one knows you are a dog. |
Cerebus The Aardvark <kreme@netcom.com> wrote:
>>Your vampires don't have to vote, and in fact they can cast different
>>votes (i.e. some voting "yes" and some voting "no").>Can A justicar cast "One for, two against?" Can a justicar cast "one for,
>two abstain?"
A single vampire has to use all or none of its votes, and if it uses them,
they have to agree.
Tom Wylie rec.games.deckmaster Network Representative for
aahz@hal.com Wizards of the Coast, Inc.
Cerebus The Aardvark <kreme@netcom.com> wrote:
>>Your vampires don't have to vote, and in fact they can cast different
>>votes (i.e. some voting "yes" and some voting "no").>Can A justicar cast "One for, two against?" Can a justicar cast "one for,
>two abstain?"
A single vampire has to use all or none of its votes, and if it uses them,
they have to agree.
Tom Wylie rec.games.deckmaster Network Representative for
aahz@hal.com Wizards of the Coast, Inc.