Eagle's Sight question - again

I now it was answered hundred times, but I found very conflicting answers, rules and erratas about this topic. So, here is my collected question about Eagle's Sight: Player A, B, C, D playing the game. Player A bleed Player B without any stealth. - Can Player C play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card cycling) BEFORE player B decide he/she is blocking or not? - Can player C to play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card cycling) AFTER player B decide he/she is blocking? - Can player C to play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card cycling) AFTER player B decide he/she is NOT blocking? It was easy. - Can player B block with superior ES (just for card cycling) the bleed? - After player A play +1 stealth and B play +1 intercept can player B block with superior ES (just for card cycling) the bleed? - After block is declared and player A play a Daring the Dawn can player B play ES for cycling? - In this case has right player C to play ES at superior? Is there any case what I forget? thanks, Bala VtES Hungary Programmer of FELDB

kbk...@gmail.com wrote: > I now it was answered hundred times, but I found very conflicting > answers, rules and erratas about this topic. > > So, here is my collected question about Eagle's Sight: > Warning: I am almost always wrong... > Player A, B, C, D playing the game. Player A bleed Player B without > any stealth. > - Can Player C play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card cycling) > BEFORE player B decide he/she is blocking or not? No. It's a directed action, so target player (B) decides first. Then it goes clockwise around the table. C MUST attempt to block: Eagle's Sight [Jyhad:U, VTES:U, CE:U, BH:PM3, LoB:PO2, Third:PTz2] Cardtype: Reaction Discipline: Auspex [aus] This reacting vampire gets +1 intercept. [AUS] This reacting vampire attempts to block the current action, ignoring the normal prey, predator or target restrictions for blocking actions. Artist: Larry MacDougall; Chris Stevens > - Can player C to play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card > cycling) AFTER player B decide he/she is blocking? Yes, but only if B declines or fails to block. > - Can player C to play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card > cycling) AFTER player B decide he/she is NOT blocking? Yes. > > It was easy. > > - Can player B block with superior ES (just for card cycling) the > bleed? Yes. > - After player A play +1 stealth and B play +1 intercept can player B > block with superior ES (just for card cycling) the bleed? No, player B has already blocked. > - After block is declared and player A play a Daring the Dawn can > player B play ES for cycling? No, at this point, Vampires cannot block this action, which I would think means they cannot even attempt. Daring the Dawn [Sabbat:R, SW:R/PV, FN:PR, LoB:PI, Third:R] Cardtype: Action Modifier Discipline: Fortitude [for] Vampires cannot block this action. The acting vampire takes 2 unpreventable aggravated damage after the action resolves. [FOR] As above, but the acting vampire takes 1 unpreventable aggravated damage. Artist: Pete Venters > - In this case has right player C to play ES at superior? Again, no, for the same reason. Wait for LSJ's reply to this one, I'm usually wrong on rules issues. best - chris -- Super Fun Cards http://stores.ebay.com/superfuncards/ auct...@superfuncards.com

[ quoted text not captured ] Thought it would be good to include all rulings regarding Eagle's Sight: Eagle's Sight: # Only affects the rule restricting who gets to block an action. The vampire must still meet all other requirements to block (intercept, etc.) In particular, Blood Bond, Day Operation, and Seduction are not circumvented. [RTR 19950413] # Can be used to overcome the restrictions on blocking (allowing a non-target Methuselah to block a directed action or a non-adjacent Methuselah to block an undirected action). It won't overcome any other restrictions on blocking (like stealth, Seduction, Day Operation, or a prior "I don't block" decision). [RTR 20020501] Best - [ quoted text not captured ]

kbk...@gmail.com wrote: > I now it was answered hundred times, but I found very conflicting > answers, rules and erratas about this topic. > > So, here is my collected question about Eagle's Sight: > > Player A, B, C, D playing the game. Player A bleed Player B without > any stealth. > - Can Player C play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card cycling) > BEFORE player B decide he/she is blocking or not? No. > - Can player C to play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card > cycling) AFTER player B decide he/she is blocking? Not until after B declines to block. > - Can player C to play Eagle's Sight in superior (just for card > cycling) AFTER player B decide he/she is NOT blocking? Yes. It isn't cycling. It requires a block attempt. > It was easy. > > - Can player B block with superior ES (just for card cycling) the > bleed? Yes. > - After player A play +1 stealth and B play +1 intercept can player B > block with superior ES (just for card cycling) the bleed? Yes. > - After block is declared and player A play a Daring the Dawn can > player B play ES for cycling? No, since e cannot block. > - In this case has right player C to play ES at superior? No, since e cannot block.

Thanks! On aug. 3, 01:06, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote: [...]