Praxis Salomon

Hi, A little question about Praxis Salomon : Is it legal to play Praxis Salomon if there is not contested cards?? Yeserday nigth we stat that it is not legal Am i in truth?

[ quoted text not captured ] Yes. P:Solomon cannot be called if there are no contested cards. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:45:22 -0400, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: >Yes. P:Solomon cannot be called if there are no contested cards. And what about a Dramatic Upheaval if we are only two players left in the game ? Remy ra...@videotron.ca

it seems legal Rafid Armani <ra...@videotron.ca> a écrit dans le message : 39c8c75f....@news.videotron.ca... [ quoted text not captured ]

Rafid Armani wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:45:22 -0400, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> > wrote: > > >Yes. P:Solomon cannot be called if there are no contested cards. > > And what about a Dramatic Upheaval if we are only two players left in > the game ? Yes. You would then select the other player (the only option available) and swap places with her if the referendum passes. [ quoted text not captured ]

On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Rafid Armani wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:45:22 -0400, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> > wrote: > > >Yes. P:Solomon cannot be called if there are no contested cards. > > And what about a Dramatic Upheaval if we are only two players left in > the game ? They switch places, of course. For all practical purposes, this means no effect, but there is certainly no ambiguity about the situation. Similarly, I assume that, for all practical purposes, one could call a Kindred Restructure that names a "new" seating order which, for all practical purposes, is virtually identical to the old. -- John Whelan

In article <39C8B162...@white-wolf.com>, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > Sylvain Gogel wrote: > > > > Hi, > > A little question about Praxis Salomon : > > Is it legal to play Praxis Salomon if there is not contested > > cards?? > > Yeserday nigth we stat that it is not legal > > > > Am i in truth? > > Yes. P:Solomon cannot be called if there are no contested cards. > Is this an extension of a meta-rule which says something like: if there is no target for card x, then card x cannnot be played? i ask because of calling Kindred Segregation or peace treaty when there are no allies or guns in play, calling a parity shift when you have the most pool, and stuff like that. Just curious about the legalities of some card-cycling ploys! > -- > LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. > Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: > http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

legb...@my-deja.com wrote: > LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > > P:Solomon cannot be called if there are no contested cards. > > > Is this an extension of a meta-rule which says something like: if > there is no target for card x, then card x cannnot be played? i No, it's just the application of that rule (ruling). No extension needed there. If a card/effect chooses/names/selects something, the it cannot be played if there is no valid "something" to be chosen. > ask because of calling Kindred Segregation or peace treaty when > there are no allies or guns in play, calling a parity shift when > you have the most pool, and stuff like that. Just curious about > the legalities of some card-cycling ploys! Peace Treaty can be played with no guns in play, so long as there are weapons of some form in play to be burned. :-) Kindred Segregation cannot be played if there are no allies in play to be burned. Partity Shift cannot be played if there is no Methuselah with more pool than you. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. [ quoted text not captured ]