Read Intentions

On 26 Jul 1995, Thaddeus Zho wrote: > > The superior on Read Intentions is "Dodge." > > Is this different from "Strike: Dodge?" > > Otherwise put, can I do my own strike and THEN dodge my opponents strike > with Read Intentions? All dodges are "Strike: Dodge". --------- Paul Schaaf sch...@u.washington.edu

[ quoted text not captured ] Urgh. That would be deadly. I'm pretty sure they meant to put Strike: Dodge on that one... -Paul-Andre

Thaddeus Zho (eter...@wam.umd.edu) wrote: : The superior on Read Intentions is "Dodge." : Is this different from "Strike: Dodge?" No. They are identical. -- Terry Wright | "Diplomacy is the art of letting Tww...@cs.usask.ca | someone else have your way." Saskatoon, Saskatchewan | - Danielle Vare Canada

eter...@wam.umd.edu (Thaddeus Zho) wrote: > >The superior on Read Intentions is "Dodge." > >Is this different from "Strike: Dodge?" > >Otherwise put, can I do my own strike and THEN dodge my opponents strike >with Read Intentions? Peace Thaddeus, All occurances of "Dodge" have been errataed to "Strike: Dodge". Nil carborundum illigitimi, James R. McClure Jr. The OS/2 Apostle <insert disclaimer here>

eter...@wam.umd.edu (Thaddeus Zho) writes: >The superior on Read Intentions is "Dodge." >Is this different from "Strike: Dodge?" >Otherwise put, can I do my own strike and THEN dodge my opponents strike >with Read Intentions? From: aa...@hal.COM (Tom Wylie) Newsgroups: rec.games.deckmaster Subject: NEW: Rulings summary for Jyhad Date: 9 Nov 1994 13:11:24 -0800 Organization: HaL Computer Systems, Inc. Dodges are always strikes, even if a card forgets to say so. -- L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | These opinions are mine and http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | are subject to card text. Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rulemonger. |