rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

[D3ck] Restless Grave

4 messages from 4 participants · 10 May 2003 – 12 May 2003
original thread on Google Groups

reyda

Restless grave. (experimental deck featuring Juggler and Seb'Goulet) Crpyt : 12 Juggler x 3 CEL DOM obf, one blood for maneuveur, one blood for dodge+additional Sebastian Goulet x 3 DOM OBF cel pro, one blood for +1 bleed Max Lowell x 2 cel obf Tayshawn Kearns x 2 cel obf Wren x 2 cel obf pro Masters : 16 2x Al's Army apparatus 1x Warzone HG 1x Twisted Forest 1x Campground HG 2x Rotschreck 1x KRCG news radio 6x Blood doll 2x Sudden Reversal Actions : 20 6x Graverobbing 6x Govern the unaligned 6x bum's rush 2x Arson Misc : 9 4x Starshell Grenade launcher 2x Improvised flamethrower 1x Ivory bow 1x Rowan Ring 1x Tasha Morgan Reaction : 12 5x Wake 5x Deflection 2x Delaying Tactics modifiers : 11 3x cloak the gathering 2x Lost in crowds 2x Elder impersonation 2x Forgotten Labyrinth 2x Seduction Combat : 18 7x Disguised weapon 5x Flash 2x Quickness 2x Earthmeld 2x wolf claws combo : 4 4x Swallowed by the night

LSJ

reyda wrote: > Subject: [D3ck] ... Why would you include a subject keyword and the purposefully negate the utility of a subject keyword? -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

James Coupe

In message <3EBEAAA...@white-wolf.com>, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> writes: >reyda wrote: >> Subject: [D3ck] ... > >Why would you include a subject keyword and the purposefully negate the >utility of a subject keyword? At a guess, because "e" and "3" are right next to each other on the keyboard. -- James Coupe PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D Lucky that my breasts are small and humble, EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 So you don't confuse them with mountains. 13D7E668C3695D623D5D

DeistMutts

LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:<3EBEAAA...@white-wolf.com>... > reyda wrote: > > Subject: [D3ck] ... > > Why would you include a subject keyword and the purposefully negate the > utility of a subject keyword? Must be an 'in' thing for internet.. But curiously.. is anyone thinking what I'm thinking? That 1000 years down the line, assuming no end-of-the-world event, would ANY future linguist or historian would actually consider this 'old language' and have college students memorize the different ways of writing/using such words and usage (like the word 'Word!') ? That relates to the other question I had in my mostly-useless brain for years.. did ppl think Odyssey was a bedtime story for kids back in those days? What is complicated now.. is probably a joke back then.. and then makes me wonder if my mediocre grades in English was actually justifiable in action.. trivial things you think about while driving in a Honda Accord.. (I think that was the brand for that commercial..) ---DeistMutts, Prince of Wakawakashakalaka---