Made my first deck with this card last night, and 2 questions came up
in the trial run...
Weigh the Heart,
[aus][ser] +1 bleed. After playing this card, you cannot play another
action modifier to further increase the bleed for this action.
[AUS][SER] Only usable as a (D) action is announced. If this action is
successful, put a corruption counter on a minion controlled by the
target Methuselah (after resolving the action).
1. Does "as the action is announced" require the card to already be in
hand or can I play an action card, draw Weigh the Heart as the
replacement and then add it? The first time I drew into by accident
and I didn't argue, but later when I played actions I'd warn everyone
to wait for me to replace before saying anything about blocking and
the like... but we'd love to know which way is correct.
2. If the d action is a bleed and the bleed is bounced, does the
"target" Methuselah for the corruption counter bounce as well? We
assumed yes, but want to be sure...
Thanks,
CJay
cro...@gmail.com wrote:
> Made my first deck with this card last night, and 2 questions came up
> in the trial run...
>
> Weigh the Heart,
> [aus][ser] +1 bleed. After playing this card, you cannot play another
> action modifier to further increase the bleed for this action.
> [AUS][SER] Only usable as a (D) action is announced. If this action is
> successful, put a corruption counter on a minion controlled by the
> target Methuselah (after resolving the action).
>
> 1. Does "as the action is announced" require the card to already be in
> hand or can I play an action card, draw Weigh the Heart as the
> replacement and then add it?
The latter.
> 2. If the d action is a bleed and the bleed is bounced, does the
> "target" Methuselah for the corruption counter bounce as well? We
> assumed yes, but want to be sure...
Yes.
On 19 ožu, 20:56, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote:
[ quoted text not captured ]
So, by that logic, does that mean that Seduction works the same way?
You don't have to have it in your hand while playing an action? You
can play an action card, and if you draw a Seduction, you can use it
then? Because everybody in my gaming environment always thought that
you have to have it in your hand...
PhantomLord wrote:
> So, by that logic, does that mean that Seduction works the same way?
> You don't have to have it in your hand while playing an action? You
> can play an action card, and if you draw a Seduction, you can use it
> then?
Yes.
> Because everybody in my gaming environment always thought that
> you have to have it in your hand...
No.