(LSJ) reducing below zero?

Hey there, I was wondering: vamp A bleeds for 1. vamp B reduces with a card that can reduce for 2. vamp A plays conditioning at superior. Is the reducing for 1 or for 2? What is the bleed for? 1 -2 +3 =2 or (1-1)=0, 0+3 =3 thx, W

[ quoted text not captured ] the bleed is for 2 , bleed (as intercept and stealth) can reach negative values

Felix wrote: > On 19 Mai, 12:47, Cooper <wouterkuy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hey there, >> >> I was wondering: vamp A bleeds for 1. vamp B reduces with a card that >> can reduce for 2. vamp A plays conditioning at superior. >> >> Is the reducing for 1 or for 2? >> >> What is the bleed for? 1 -2 +3 =2 >> or (1-1)=0, 0+3 =3 >> >> thx, >> W > > the bleed is for 2 , bleed (as intercept and stealth) can reach > negative values Correct.

[ quoted text not captured ] > Correct.- Zitierten Text ausblenden - > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen - another question. imagine the following situation: methusala a controls a setite and and calls a free states rant , methusala b controls a primogen with a rastacurere on it , and therefore 0 default votes , if the primogen now plays a superior dread gaze , will he have 3 or 4 votes? (since free states rant reduces them further)?

Felix wrote: > another question. imagine the following situation: methusala a > controls a setite and and calls a free states rant , methusala b > controls a primogen with a rastacurere on it , and therefore 0 default > votes , if the primogen now plays a superior dread gaze , will he have > 3 or 4 votes? (since free states rant reduces them further)? Three. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/daaf56c71e2e6a62