Question 1.) Some one blocks, plays IotK during combat, an illusion
dukes it out and then combat ends... can I then play fast reaction by
another one of my blocking minions, or was that needed to be played
directly after IotK?
Question 2.) I shim over to another vampire after blocking... after
that combat, the original 'blocking' vampire is capable of playing
fast reaction, yes?
~SV
vermillian wrote:
> Question 1.) Some one blocks, plays IotK during combat, an illusion
> dukes it out and then combat ends... can I then play fast reaction by
> another one of my blocking minions, or was that needed to be played
> directly after IotK?
Neither. FR cannot be played after the IotK combat (either the blocker
or the acting minion is absent) nor before (since IotK has set up an
impending combat).
> Question 2.) I shim over to another vampire after blocking... after
> that combat, the original 'blocking' vampire is capable of playing
> fast reaction, yes?
Probably not, but I don't know what "shim" is. Is suspect it involves
one of the new combatants being neither acting nor blocking however.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
LSJ wrote:
|| vermillian wrote:
||| Question 2.) I shim over to another vampire after blocking...
||| after that combat, the original 'blocking' vampire is capable of
||| playing fast reaction, yes?
||
|| Probably not, but I don't know what "shim" is.
play shimulo deception after block is succesful (see thread title)
|| Is suspect it involves one of the new combatants
|| being neither acting no blocking however.
correct ;)
reyda wrote:
> LSJ wrote:
> || Probably not, but I don't know what "shim" is.
>
> play shimulo deception after block is succesful (see thread title)
1) One should not exclude content from the body based on the subject line.
The subject line is supposed to describe the body, not replace it.
2) "Shim" means something else in English.
[ quoted text not captured ]
LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:<3E898BA...@white-wolf.com>...
> reyda wrote:
> > LSJ wrote:
> > || Probably not, but I don't know what "shim" is.
> >
> > play shimulo deception after block is succesful (see thread title)
>
> 1) One should not exclude content from the body based on the subject line.
> The subject line is supposed to describe the body, not replace it.
>
> 2) "Shim" means something else in English.
But being LSJ-ish, from now on, will mean being a stuck up prude. :P
The question was, in "english"
I, a methuselah, am not the acting methuselah. Some other player, who
is not me, is acting. I attempt to block with a minion, who is a
vampire, and has Auspex, at any given level. Now another minion,
controlled by me, who is a vampire and who has Chimestry, lets say at
the superior level, plays SHIMULO DECEPTION, and now is the blocking
mininion. After this combat, can the original vampire play Fast
Reaction?
~SV
vermillian wrote:
> LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:<3E898BA...@white-wolf.com>...>>reyda wrote:>>>LSJ wrote:
>>>|| Probably not, but I don't know what "shim" is.
>>>play shimulo deception after block is succesful (see thread title)>>
>>1) One should not exclude content from the body based on the subject line.
>>The subject line is supposed to describe the body, not replace it.
>>
>>2) "Shim" means something else in English.>
>
> But being LSJ-ish, from now on, will mean being a stuck up prude. :P
Failure to follow unfamiliar shorthand/notation/jargon = prudishness.
OK. It's your thread. :-)
> The question was, in "english"
>
> I, a methuselah, am not the acting methuselah. Some other player, who
> is not me, is acting. I attempt to block with a minion, who is a
> vampire, and has Auspex, at any given level. Now another minion,
> controlled by me, who is a vampire and who has Chimestry, lets say at
Chimerstry. Two r's. Not English, though, AFAIK, so you're off the hook there.
"let's" has an apostrophe in English, though. :-)
> the superior level, plays SHIMULO DECEPTION, and now is the blocking
That's Shilmulo Deception, BTW. "Shilm", not "Shim".
Perhaps adding to my previous confusion. :-)
> mininion. After this combat, can the original vampire play Fast
> Reaction?
Per card text, yes. Fast Reaction can be played "after a combat between a
blocking minion you control other than this vampire and the acting minion."
The vampire who is not this vampire is a blocking minion you control and
has just completed combat with the acting minion.
[ quoted text not captured ]
>> The question was, in "english"
>>
>> I, a methuselah, am not the acting methuselah. Some other player, who
>> is not me, is acting. I attempt to block with a minion, who is a
>> vampire, and has Auspex, at any given level. Now another minion,
>> controlled by me, who is a vampire and who has Chimestry, lets say at>
>Chimerstry. Two r's. Not English, though, AFAIK, so you're off the hook
>there.
>
>"let's" has an apostrophe in English, though. :-)
I, on the other hand, can't wait to see a 3-cap with superior Chemistry...
=)
>> the superior level, plays SHIMULO DECEPTION, and now is the blocking>
>That's Shilmulo Deception, BTW. "Shilm", not "Shim".
>Perhaps adding to my previous confusion. :-)
Ha ha. And all this time I thought he meant to use the term "shimmy." You know.
"I shimmy over to another vampire after blocking" =P
Halcyan 2
> I, on the other hand, can't wait to see a 3-cap with superior Chemistry...
> =)
Uma Hatch?
--
Comments Welcome,
Norman S. Brown, Jr.
XZealot
Archon of the Swamp
"Halcyan 2" <halc...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030401210826...@mb-fj.aol.com...
> >> The question was, in "english"
> >>
> >> I, a methuselah, am not the acting methuselah. Some other player, who
> >> is not me, is acting. I attempt to block with a minion, who is a
> >> vampire, and has Auspex, at any given level. Now another minion,
> >> controlled by me, who is a vampire and who has Chimestry, lets say at
> >
> >Chimerstry. Two r's. Not English, though, AFAIK, so you're off the hook
> >there.
> >
> >"let's" has an apostrophe in English, though. :-)
>
>
> I, on the other hand, can't wait to see a 3-cap with superior Chemistry...
> =)
No, no, not Chemistry. Its superior Chin-estry, as found on Horatio
Ballard...
DaveZ
Atom Weaver