[LSJ] Freakdrive Q

Vamp A takes an action that is blocked by Vamp B controlled by his prey. Vamp B sends Vamp A to torpor in the resulting combat. Can Vamp A use freakdrive to untap even though he is in torpor?

[ quoted text not captured ] Yes, if he has superior Fortitude. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

[ quoted text not captured ] Yes. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22freak+drive%22+torpor+author:LSJ&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=3C1B44DA.8EBE505C%40white-wolf.com&rnum=3 --Colin McGuigan

"Colin McGuigan" <maguaSP...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message news:beidnZXe7M7...@speakeasy.net... > Pacal wrote: > > Vamp A takes an action that is blocked by Vamp B controlled by his prey. > > > > Vamp B sends Vamp A to torpor in the resulting combat. > > > > Can Vamp A use freakdrive to untap even though he is in torpor? > > Yes. > ---So long as he has the blood to pay for it. DarkA

[ quoted text not captured ] You mean you can't play cards if you don't have the blood to pay for them? Why do people keep introducing such complicated rules? --Colin McGuigan

[ quoted text not captured ] Lack of smileys is causing an issue, here. Did you really mean this question to prompt a response, or were you speaking in jest? > --Colin McGuigan Kevin M., Prince of Henderson, NV (USA) "Know your enemy, and know yourself; in one-thousand battles you shall never be in peril." -- Sun Tzu, *The Art of War* "Contentment... Complacency... Catastrophe!" -- Joseph Chevalier

Kevin M. wrote: >>>---So long as he has the blood to pay for it. >>>DarkA >> >>You mean you can't play cards if you don't have the blood to pay for >>them? Why do people keep introducing such complicated rules? > > > Lack of smileys is causing an issue, here. > > Did you really mean this question to prompt a response, or were you speaking > in jest? Jest. (I assumed that labelling "having to have blood to pay for a card to pay it" as a "complicated rule" would be obvious. I'll be more careful in the future.) (But speaking of complicated rules, I was just informed today that if you don't have enough pool to pay for a card, you can't play it either. Sigh. I harken back to the good ol' days where everything was simple, and all the rules fit on a single card, instead of this booklet-thing.) (Oh, oops. Almost forgot: =P ) --Colin McGuigan

"Kevin M." <you...@imaspammer.org> wrote in message news:<oBwFb.21424$J77.14937@fed1read07>... > Colin McGuigan <maguaSP...@speakeasy.net> wrote: > > Darka wrote: > >> "Colin McGuigan" <maguaSP...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message > >> news:beidnZXe7M7...@speakeasy.net... > >>>Pacal wrote: > >>> > >>>>Vamp A takes an action that is blocked by Vamp B controlled > >>>>by his prey. > >>>> > >>>>Vamp B sends Vamp A to torpor in the resulting combat. > >>>> > >>>>Can Vamp A use freakdrive to untap even though he is in torpor? > >>> > >>>Yes. > >>> > >> ---So long as he has the blood to pay for it. > >> DarkA > > > > You mean you can't play cards if you don't have the blood to pay for > > them? Why do people keep introducing such complicated rules? > > Lack of smileys is causing an issue, here. > > Did you really mean this question to prompt a response, or were you speaking > in jest? > I think in some cases you can see the smileys even if they are not really there. W

My guess is : it was a big joke !!! ;-p

Wouter Kuyper <Wouter...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I think in some cases you can see the smileys even > if they are not really there. > W Obviously you missed this fun thread: http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=7v4dtvshsbr1jj6a35dnscbko7pdf7298e% 404ax.com You can't be TOO careful on THIS newsgroup, lemme tell ya. [ quoted text not captured ]

Colin McGuigan <maguaSP...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message news:<48ecnVf7H7e...@speakeasy.net>... > I harken back to the good ol' days where everything was simple, > and all the rules fit on a single card, instead of this booklet-thing.) > > > --Colin McGuigan come to think of it, maybe WW could make a seperate Chimistry booklet, those cards look mighty complicated ;-) Pacal "the doctor is in" Moulinex.

"Colin McGuigan" <maguaSP...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message news:OVqdneg_p40...@speakeasy.net... [ quoted text not captured ] Sorry, i'll be more careful to remember my smilies in the future. :) Darka