rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

TOM: QUESTION

4 messages from 4 participants · 23 May 1995 – 05 June 1995
original thread on Google Groups

SCALAR NORSE

What happens when a meth who has the rack affecting a vamp has that vamp stolen via grave robbing? does does the vamp get 2 blood during the meth's turn who owns the rack? does does the vamp get 2 blood during the meth's turn who owns vamp? does the rack change control? does the owner of the rack choose a new vamp to use it on? does the rack just disapear? Much appreaciated if a justifiable answer is forthcoming.

L. Scott Johnson

In article <3pseqn$6...@news.nevada.edu>, SCALAR NORSE <wa...@nevada.edu> wrote: >What happens when a meth who has the rack affecting a vamp has that vamp >stolen via grave robbing? > > >does does the vamp get 2 blood during the meth's turn who owns the rack? Yes. > >does does the vamp get 2 blood during the meth's turn who owns vamp? > No. Note: The two above answers may be reversed if card text warrants it - I don't beleive that it does, but haven't committed the card to memory yet :-) >does the rack change control? No. > >does the owner of the rack choose a new vamp to use it on? Never. The Rack re-targets only when it changes controllers. (card text) > >does the rack just disapear? Never. (Barring location-burners like Arson, Rampage, Unnatural Disaster). References: From: aa...@cats.ucsc.edu (Thomas R Wylie) Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad Subject: Re: Q: The Rack Date: 16 Dec 1994 02:14:21 GMT Message-ID: <3cqt5t$r...@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> <torqu...@inquisition.spanish.org> wrote: >If a vampire with the rack gets burnt, does the controller of the burnt >vampire keep possession of the rack, or is the rack lost? And if the >player keeps the rack, does he/she place it on a new vampire? The Rack remains in play but is useless unless the Rack changes controller. Tom Wylie rec.games.trading-cards.* Network Representative for aa...@cats.ucsc.edu Wizards of the Coast, Inc. ---------- From: aa...@cats.ucsc.edu (Thomas R Wylie) Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad Subject: Re: The Rack Date: 4 Mar 1995 19:43:32 GMT Message-ID: <3jaft4$l...@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> I see no reason why the Rack would stop feeding a vampire which had changed controllers, but will check on that just in case. Tom Wylie rec.games.trading-cards.* Network Representative for aa...@cats.ucsc.edu Wizards of the Coast, Inc. -- ----- L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com) | The opinions expressed are mine Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rulemonger | and subject to card text

Thomas R Wylie

SCALAR NORSE <wa...@nevada.edu> wrote: >What happens when a meth who has the rack affecting a vamp has that vamp >stolen via grave robbing? The Rack says nothing about the vampire receiving the benefit changing controllers, so the vampire would still get the benefit of the Rack until the conditions described on the Rack were met. [ quoted text not captured ]

Steven Bauer

In article <3ptb5b$9...@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> aa...@cats.ucsc.edu (Thomas R Wylie) writes: > >SCALAR NORSE <wa...@nevada.edu> wrote: >>What happens when a meth who has the rack affecting a vamp has that vamp >>stolen via grave robbing? And Tom Wylie Wrote: >The Rack says nothing about the vampire receiving the benefit changing >controllers, so the vampire would still get the benefit of the Rack until >the conditions described on the Rack were met. > So If the condition described above happens in a two player game there is no way for the Methuselah controlling the rack(an not the effected vamp) to nullify the racks effects on the vampire? (Short of burning the vampire or stealing him back) Also which methuselah decides how much blood the vamp takes? The text reads: up to 2 blood, or does the vampire always take as much blood as he possible can? Thanks in advance, Steven Bauer Who think the "controller" should have some control. ba...@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu