Dragon's Breath Rounds and Target Vitals

I strike for one with a Saturday Night Special, playing Target Vitals with the strike. After my opponent declares his strike, I play Dragon's Breath Rounds. Does the extra damage from Vitals inherit the aggravated nature of the two points of DBR damage, or does it stay non- aggravated? John Eno

[ quoted text not captured ] The 2 points of additional damage from Target Vitals are not aggravated. http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=rulings # Additional damage inherits all of the properties of the base damage (So the +1 damage from lucky blow is aggravated for Basilia). [RTR ] # The base damage does not inherit the properties of the additional damage (So a Saturday Night Special with Dragon's Breath Rounds does 1 normal plus 2 aggravated damage). [RTR ] # Effects that increase the damage provided by strike cards affect those cards rather than the striking minion (so the added damage is the same type as the strike's damage, not the base damage). [RTR 19970630] Carpe noctem. The Lasombra http://www.TheLasombra.com Your best source of V:TES information. Now also selling boxes and individual cards.

[ quoted text not captured ] So if I target Vitals a strike using Wolf claws, does that mean the TV is agg too as the base dmg is ag? Sorry, my brain is numb from work

Blooded Sand wrote: > So if I target Vitals a strike using Wolf claws, does that mean the TV > is agg too as the base dmg is ag? Sorry, my brain is numb from work Correct.

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:57:13 -0800 (PST), Blooded Sand wrote: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=rulings >So if I target Vitals a strike using Wolf claws, does that mean the TV >is agg too as the base dmg is ag? Sorry, my brain is numb from work Yes. Additional damage inherits all of the properties of the base damage (So the +1 damage from lucky blow is aggravated for Basilia). [ quoted text not captured ]

On Dec 30, 11:42 am, The Lasombra <TheLasom...@hotmail.com> wrote: > The 2 points of additional damage from Target Vitals are not > aggravated. > > http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=rulings Ah, thank you! I had looked around the newsgroup for information on this, but didn't think to look at the rulings page. John Eno