I have made some research and find no answer to that question (perhaps,
I have made a mistake..).
What happens if two players are ousted in the same time, and last stand
is in play, under the control of one of the remaining player.
The two ousted players are not prey-predator.
What "predator" get the new turn ?
Thanx.
[ quoted text not captured ]
The predator whose turn would have come first in the standard order
(clockwise).
Card text: if more than one was ousted, go clockwise from the left of
the Methuselah whose turn just ended.
Put this card in play. When any other Methuselah is ousted, the current
turn ends, and this card is burned. The predator of the ousted
Methuselah (if more than one was ousted, go clockwise from the left of
the Methuselah whose turn just ended) takes the next turn.
The "go clockwise" doesn't apply fo the "research" of the
"primary"ousted methuselah ? But for searching for the predator of one
of the ousted methuselah ?
Sorry to insist...
Thanx for your fast answers.
kamel...@yvelines.pref.gouv.fr wrote:
> Put this card in play. When any other Methuselah is ousted, the current
> turn ends, and this card is burned. The predator of the ousted
> Methuselah (if more than one was ousted, go clockwise from the left of
> the Methuselah whose turn just ended) takes the next turn.
>
> The "go clockwise" doesn't apply fo the "research" of the
> "primary"ousted methuselah ?
Correct.
> But for searching for the predator of one
> of the ousted methuselah ?
Correct.
The predator whose turn would have come first in the standard order
(clockwise) among the predators of the ousted Methuselahs takes the
next turn.
A-B-C-D-E seated clockwise.
A's turn. Last Stand in play (controlled by someone not ousted in each
of the scenarios below)
A,B ousted => E's turn
A,C ousted => B's turn
A,D ousted => C's turn
A,E ousted => D's turn
B,C ousted => A's turn
B,D ousted => C's turn
B,E ousted => D's turn
C,D ousted => B's turn
C,E ousted => B's turn
D,E ousted => C's turn
A,B,C ousted => E's turn
A,B,D ousted => C's turn
A,B,E ousted => D's turn
A,C,D ousted => B's turn
A,C,E ousted => B's turn
A,D,E ousted => C's turn
B,C,D ousted => A's turn
B,C,E ousted => D's turn
B,D,E ousted => C's turn
C,D,E ousted => B's turn
LSJ wrote:
> kamel...@yvelines.pref.gouv.fr wrote:
> > Put this card in play. When any other Methuselah is ousted, the current
> > turn ends, and this card is burned. The predator of the ousted
> > Methuselah (if more than one was ousted, go clockwise from the left of
> > the Methuselah whose turn just ended) takes the next turn.
> >
> > The "go clockwise" doesn't apply fo the "research" of the
> > "primary"ousted methuselah ?
>
> Correct.
>
> > But for searching for the predator of one
> > of the ousted methuselah ?
>
> Correct.
>
> The predator whose turn would have come first in the standard order
> (clockwise) among the predators of the ousted Methuselahs takes the
> next turn.
>
> A-B-C-D-E seated clockwise.
>
> A's turn. Last Stand in play (controlled by someone not ousted in each
> of the scenarios below)
(snip)
> B,D ousted => C's turn
(snip)
??? i thought the phrasing was such as if i am A and i play last stand,
if i manage to oust B i play again regardless of ousting other people
at the same time (means i go seeing the first ousted clockwise find B
--> i play)
Your ruling makes it that not only I have to oust my prey (and possibly
my prey's prey) but be careful not to oust anyone crosstable. For 6
pool this card is even more cornercase i thought....
Andrea
andrea.la.ma...@infinito.it wrote:
>
> ??? i thought the phrasing was such as if i am A and i play last stand,
> if i manage to oust B i play again regardless of ousting other people
> at the same time (means i go seeing the first ousted clockwise find B
> --> i play)
> Your ruling makes it that not only I have to oust my prey (and possibly
> my prey's prey) but be careful not to oust anyone crosstable. For 6
> pool this card is even more cornercase i thought....
>
> Andrea
Then again....
while pressing the post button i realized it makes perfect sense, we
don't want action (a krc for example) to mess too much with table
dynamics....ousting someone not in your direct interest makes me end
turn and pass....
Sorry for the bandthwidth
Andrea